recombinant igfbp2 (R&D Systems)
Structured Review

Recombinant Igfbp2, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 24 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant igfbp2/product/R&D Systems
Average 94 stars, based on 24 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "IGFBP2 secretion by mammary adipocytes limits breast cancer invasion."
Article Title: IGFBP2 secretion by mammary adipocytes limits breast cancer invasion.
Journal: Science advances
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg1840
Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 2. Stromal-derived IGFBP2 is sufficient to inhibit MM231 breast cancer cell invasion. (A and B) Representative images (A) and quantification (B) of MM231 breast cancer cell invasion in inverted collagen/fibronectin matrices in the presence of conditioned medium from HUVECs transfected with siRNAs against IGFBP2 (siIGFBP2_1 and siIGFBP2_2) or siNTC. Scale bars, 50 μm. n = 3 biological replicates performed in triplicate, with three stacksper transwell; one-way ANOVAwith Tukey correction; **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant. (C and D) Representative Western blot (C) and densitometry analysis (D) of TIFs stably overexpressing mTurquoise2 (mT2) or IGFBP2 (n = 4; one-sample t test; *P < 0.05). (E) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for human IGFBP2 in concentrated conditioned media from TIFs overex- pressing mT2 or IGFBP2, measured in duplicate (n = 3 biological replicates; two-tailed Student’s t test; **P < 0.01). (F) Representative images and quantification of fibro- blast-contracted 3D collagen invasion assays of MM231 cancer cell invasion in mT2 or IGFBP2 TIF-contracted matrices after 14 days and stained for Pan-CK (brown). Scale bars, 100 μm. n = 3 biological replicates, triplicate matrices, eight regions per condition per replicate; one-way ANOVA with Tukey correction; ***P < 0.001. (G and H) Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) images (G) and quantification (H) of MM231 cell invasion into the mouse dermis from subcutaneous xenografts of MM231 co-injected with TIFs overexpressing either mT2 (control) or IGFBP2. Scale bars, 500 μm; insets, 50 μm. n = 10 mice (mT2) or 12 mice (IGFBP2).
Techniques Used: Derivative Assay, Transfection, Western Blot, Stable Transfection, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Two Tailed Test, Staining, Injection, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 4. IGFBP2 acts through depletion of IGF-II from the cancer microenvironment. (A) Sche- matic of the proteomics experimental setup. LC- MS/MS, liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. IP, immunoprecipitation. (B and C) Representative Western blot (B) and densitome- try analysis (C) after silencing of IGF2 (IGF-II gene) using siRNAs in MM231 cells (n = 4 biological replicates; one-sample t test; *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001). (D and E) Representative images (D) and quantification (E) of MM231 cell invasion in in- verted collagen/fibronectin matrices after IGF2 silencing. Scale bars, 50 μm. n = 3 biological replicates, performed in duplicate with three stacks per transwell; one-way ANOVA with Tukey correction; ***P < 0.001. (F and G) Representative images (F) and quantification (G) of MM231 cell invasion in inverted collagen/fibronectin matri- ces treated with PBS, IGF-II (10 ng/ml), IgG1κ (10 μg/ml), or anti–IGF-II (10 μg/ml). Scale bars, 50 μm. n = 3 biological replicates, performed in duplicate with three stacks per transwell; one- way ANOVA with Tukey correction; ***P < 0.001. (H and I) Representative IGF-II Western blot (H) and quantification (I) of TIF, MM231, MM468, and HCC1937 cells (n = 6 biological replicates; one- sample t test; ***P < 0.001). (J) ELISA for human IGF-II in conditioned media from TIF, MM231, MM468, and HCC1937 cells (n = 4 biological replicates; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s cor- rection; *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001). (K and L) Matrigel invasion assays for MM231 (K) and MM468 (L) cells treated with IgG1κ or anti–IGF-II (n = 3, eight fields of view (FOVs) per chamber, two to three invasion chambers per condition per replicate; two-tailed Student’s t test with Welch’s correction; **P < 0.01). Scale bars, 100 μm. (M) Schematic of the proposed mechanism for IGFBP2 inhibition of invasion through dis- ruption of breast cancer IGF-II autocrine signaling.
Techniques Used: Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectroscopy, Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Two Tailed Test, Inhibition
Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 5. IGFBP2 expression during breast cancer progression. (A) Representative H&E-stained breast tissue samples from healthy patients, patients with DCIS, or pa- tients with IDC. Scale bars, 200 μm. (B) Quantification of adipocytes per section from healthy (n = 8 patients, three to eight sections per patient), DCIS (n = 6 patients, one to four sections per patient), and IDC (n = 3 patients, one to two sections per patient). Kruskal-Wallis test using Dunn’s test to correct for multiple comparisons (**P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001). (C) Representative image from a patient sample stained for IGFBP2 (magenta) and counterstained with DAPI (cyan) and keratin-8/keratin-14 (KRT8/14; red). Scale bar, 100 μm. n = 8 normal reduction mammoplasty patient samples. Autofluorescence is given in green. (D) Representative image of human DCIS breast cancer tissue stained for IGFBP2 (magenta) and counterstained with DAPI (cyan) and KRT8/14 (red). Scale bar, 100 μm (n = 4 DCIS patient samples). Autofluorescence is given in green. (E) Representative image of human IDC breast cancer tissue stained for IGFBP2 (magenta) and counterstained with DAPI (cyan) and KRT8/14 (red; n = 3 IDC patient samples). Scale bar, 100 μm. Autofluorescence is given in green. The brightness of IGFBP2 staining was increased for display purposes only. (F) Quantification of IGFBP2 per adipocyte from healthy (n = 8 patients, 143 to 280 adipocytes per patient), DCIS (n = 6 patients, 39 to 410 adipocytes per patient), and IDC (n = 3 patients, 75 to 283 adipocytes per patient). Kruskal-Wallis test using Dunn’s test to correct for multiple comparisons (***P < 0.001).
Techniques Used: Expressing, Staining

